tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5314789.post6191078759362228331..comments2023-10-16T08:56:02.198+00:00Comments on Ricercar: natural selectionRicercarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12561382861235675879noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5314789.post-73498097691085337662007-07-10T15:07:00.000+00:002007-07-10T15:07:00.000+00:00The study makes sense though the explanation there...The study makes sense though the explanation therein doesn't. Given that the male specifies the sex, an alpha-male would produce virile male offspring but female offspring with more masculine traits and hence, less fertile reproductive systems. I missed your extrapolation, though...Erotemehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03677513867884448593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5314789.post-58533224391345093252007-07-01T11:26:00.000+00:002007-07-01T11:26:00.000+00:00Prometheus_Unbound, i think you are talking about ...Prometheus_Unbound, i think you are talking about something different. low socio economic status i would think would be more related to nurture than than to nature, the old nature versus nurture debate, whereas here i think they are talkimng more about the genetic inheritencePreronahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08873055320080221754noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5314789.post-49635283416803272422007-07-01T09:22:00.000+00:002007-07-01T09:22:00.000+00:00Interesting read.Look at it this way, around most ...Interesting read.<BR/>Look at it this way, around most economies in the world, the poorer sections of society have the highest fertility rates. Doesn't the chances of success for children born in a disadvantaged section decrease.<BR/><BR/>But as you said it, the argument can go either way.Prometheus_Unboundhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05697529624292910025noreply@blogger.com